Mag. As long as you know were and how much it's dropping either of those calibers will work. I've also heard that it doesn't create as big of hole. Like over 400 yards. Copyright Ron Spomer Outdoors © document.write(new Date().getFullYear()) For the elk we've taken, shot placement determined how much effective damage was done. I want one gun for both. is easily one of the top choices for many hunters. As mentioned earlier, it would be hard to discount the .270 or the 30-06 either. I have killed elk with ,260 rem, 6.5 x 284, 270 win, 270 wsm, 7mm saum, 7mm rem mag, 300 wsm. in 7mm RM factory loads than 300 WM loads. vs. 338. I was most always hunting Deer when the Elk showed up. This year I have saved up enough money and wanted to get my own. The 7mm (.284-inch) bullet drops less at all ranges even though the .308-inch bullet has a more efficient, minimum drag B.C. is a descendant of the mighty .375 H&H and has seen widespread use in every sphere from military applications to big-game hunting. I have shot many deer with it, 4 elk and every one was dropped in it's tracks. Even that is too much for most people to practice with a lot. If you like the 7 mag, it will suite you well. Updated: May 10, 2019. My son saved up for his first shotgun and bought it last summer. You are using an out of date browser. What do you guys use, and what would you recommend? By Joseph von Benedikt. I have decided on either a tikka t3 lite, Sako A7 roughteck pro or a Remington SPS stainless. Killed his first big goose. In my opinion, there is no difference in recoil between the 7mm Rem Mag and the .300 Win Mag. I'm a BIG Remington guy, but that Roughtech is a sweet rifle. Go big kid! Win. I know that a ton of you probably use a 270 and can bag an elk no problem. I would say if you've used the 7 mag and are familiar with it, then go with it. I have just never been thrilled by the 7mm Rem Mag. I have taken everything from elk to deer to antelope with it. Sounds like you may already own a rifle in the caliber you describe. We put 3 popular cartridges to a head-to-head-to-head test He just soaked up two rounds to the shoulder and one to the neck before wobbling and falling. Or, do I want to kill an elk deader? Does the perfect muley cartridge really exist? I was sure I needed that magnum "edge." Shot placement and bullet selection are more important than caliber.I have a Tikka T3 lite stainless and love it. One was a cow elk at 357 yards, free handed nothing near by to steady. Mag. 300 win mag. In the last 20 years bullet technology has improved dramatically, so a lighter bullet performs on game like a heavier bullet used to. The .270 Win HAS less bullet, "Drop" (Flatter Trajectory) than the .308 and with, a 140 grain Nosler AccuBond or, partition, starting at 3,000 FPS, should be an efficient "Elk slayer" to about, 500 yards ! The ballistics coefficient is what determines that. You can study the data and decide which option you like best. ratings, but these should get you close. Elk Cartridge Field Report: .270 Winchester, 7mm Rem. and .300 Wby. Take the extra and put it towards glass. and 300 Win. No rocking, no slamming to the ground. Study ammo catalogs and you’ll see there are usually 160-grain to 175-grain bullets offered aboard 7mm RM, but the 300 WM usually tops out at 180-grains with a few offerings at 190- or 200-grains, but rarely high B.C. Mag. In general .30 cal bullets have a lower BC than 7mm, 6.5, and 6mm bullets. We shot and compared three popular options to help you decide on the best elk cartridge for your style of hunting The Browning X-Bolt features a low luster finish on the receiver and barrel, and the walnut color both looks great and prevents glare or reflection from giving away your location during a hunting trip.. Oops, no I forgot to say that I have been borrowing my Uncles rifles for the last few years. I would ignore the 338 unless you someday want to hunt grizzles in Alaska or something! Bullet B.C. We’ll zero all rifles at 250 yards and shoot in a 10 mph right angle wind. On most of those occasions I was handed a .30-06 or a .300 magnum, and every time it performed just as well as any 7mm I could have used. THIS ^^^^ GOOD advice ! Mag. Of your choices the .338 is the one that doesn't fit just because you mentioned longer shots. Hi, my name is Brett. Just like with ammo, the major gun manufacturers produce sporting rifles chambered in all three cartridges. For shooting elk or similar sized critters a 160 to 180 grain bullet is just about ideal. when firing optimum bullets in each. I am 17, and I hunt mule deer in southern Oregon where it is pretty open and flat. I would use a 300 win. vs. .300 Win. Sometimes its not as much fun dealing with recoil as you get older. The differences in available loads could make one perform significantly better than the other. Mag. There is one for sale on longrangehunting for just over a grand In 7mm Remington even. This 300 Win Mag rifle is also fairly affordable and weighs only 7 pounds, making it the lightest choice on our list. Mag(Winchester Magnum) and 7MM (Remington Magnum) are very popular in hunting circles here in the United States because of their good ballistics at range on larger game such as elk. Oddly enough, given expectations of the rabble, it was not the .338 Winchester necked down. So like no exotic calibers. Anyone planning on shooting factory ammunition in either of these magnums should study the market carefully before choosing between the 7mm RM and 300 WM. mtmuley. 7MM Rem Mag. However, the.300 Winchester Magnum generally uses heavier bullets than the 7mm Remington Magnum. Here’s a sampling of currently cataloged 7mm and 300 WM loads from a variety of brands: Clearly you’ll find more long range options (high MV and B.C.) I would much rather skip right past any 300 Mag and have my .338 Win Mag in … That is the biggest question. If you’re recoil sensitive… None of this matters to the elk. JavaScript is disabled. However, this small differential in size does not affect the fact that they can both be used in standard / long-action rifles. Any of the calibers listed above would work fine but the 7mm would generally have a little less recoil. This will go over the key differences and similarities between the 300 Win. Accuracy overrules power, and almost everyone shoots more accurately when there is less recoil. One uses the 300 Win Mag handloaded 180gr, the other uses the .30-06 handloaded 180gr, and I use the 7mm Rem Mag 160gr factory Nosler Partition as loaded by Federal. All Rights Reserved, Study ammo catalogs and you’ll see there are usually 160-grain to 175-grain bullets offered aboard 7mm RM, but the, Anyone planning on shooting factory ammunition in either of these magnums should study the market carefully before choosing between the. Some are designed for long range, some for close. This is why so many elk guides carry the 7mm mag in the first place. A popular long range load for the 300 Win Mag near this range is the 190 grain Berger VLD. Once you answer that question, you'll have the correct answer. My first rifle was a 7 RM, which I bought to replace my dad's 30-06 I was using. 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag – Most Popular Rounds As we come to the end of our review, we will like to share some of the best rounds that are perfect for certain applications: We chose the HSM Berger 168gr magnum for the Remington cartridge because it is a heavyweight, ideal for hunting purposes, and makes the handling of recoil easy. Inside of 200 yards no advantage. I would pick a 7mm mag above the 7mm rum. The 7mm mag and the 30-06 that I used where both my uncles. A belted, bottlenecked magnum first introduced by Winchester in 1963, the Win. Just put your shot were it needs to go. So you need to ask yourself... Do I want to kill an elk dead? If you compare 7mm and .30 cal. The .300 Winchester appeared a year after Remington’s 7mm. I also hunt elk in western Oregon where there is lots of hills and thick timber. or a 7RM because I have them. Any of the calibers you mentioned will work just fine. Hunting gifts received-let’s see/hear ‘em. In a previous blog we investigated the subtle differences between the 7mm Rem. The 7mm-08 is better than, the .308 but, I'd stay with the .270 Win… Preferred by long range hunters and military snipers over the … I have to say that I'm pretty sold on the 7mm but I don't know too much about the 300 mags and the other calibers. All of the factory loads above will suffice, as this video of a 6x6 bull elk kill suggests. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Mag. If you’re looking for longer range performance advantages, choose carefully because there are huge performance differences among these loads. 1. If I were getting one gun to do it all, it would be 270 or 280, which is a 30-06 case shooting 7 mm bullets. I always bring my 300 win mag as a back up incase my 06 scope gets bumped or for a really windy day, but my 06 is the go to rifle. Mule Deer Cartridge Showdown: .270 Win. It might change your mind. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. There have been a handful of lever action and single shot rifles chambered in .308 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield over the years. The 7mm Rem Mag overall length is slightly smaller than the .300 Win Mag – 3.34 inches against 3.29 inches. Mag. Also there needs to be a good selection of ammo and be generally easy to find. Mag. Here’s a sampling of currently cataloged 7mm and 300 WM loads from a variety of brands: Clearly you’ll find more long range options (high MV and B.C.) They can hit their mark accurately at long range. It is easy to shoot verses the 300 Win mag shooting max 180 or 200 grain loads. Recently I've gone to 270, because modern 150 gr rounds in 270 equal or better the 175 gr rounds I always used in the 7 mag for elk. The 270 weighs a lot less and costs less to shoot, and recoil/noise is less than the 7. They are not necessary. This is because the MV was 200 fps faster. It's got a little less explosive expansion, and tends to guarantee an exit wound which I like. If you never plan on shooting game beyond 300 yards, don’t worry about any of this. I've used a 30-06 the last few years before this last year switching to 7mm Remington mag. Shooting game past 400 yards really isn't a good idea for anyone. Consider all these factors when contemplating your options. I have shot most of my stuff with a .300 Win mag and it has never failed me. Weight of the bullets in grains does not mean it is better in the wind. Find a tough cartridge for one of the most prized and toughest hooved big game animals around. I gained nothing important in going from 06 to 7 RM. The 300 win mag is great but if you are at all recoil sensitive then the 300 win is going to need a break. In this update, we’re going to investigate real-world performance differences among some readily available factory loaded ammunition. I love my 7 mags, but the 06 will do everything the others will do. Remember, the slower the MV and lower the bullet B.C., the poorer the ballistic performance across the board: more … Just my opinion. The logical bottom end for the .300 Winchester ranges between 130 and 150 grains, depending on bullet construction; the 7mm Rem. Be aware that rifles/barrels can slightly alter manufacturer B.C. For all practical purposes though, there isn’t a significant difference in the ballistics of the .300 Win Mag and 7mm Rem Mag at typical hunting ranges. And the lighter bullet "shoots flatter." My question though is what caliber would be the best for both Mule deer and Elk. Now for Elk I would much rather have more power to anchor an Elk before it gets a chance to get into the thick fallen timber were we hunted in NW Colorado. My 7mm mag elk load is the 175 A-Frame at 2950 ft/s. Comparing the two, the .300 Win. On the other hand, most.300 Win Mag loads use 150-230 grain bullets. Recoil differences between full-house 175-grain 7mm RM and 180-grain 300 WM loads are so minimal as to be ignored. Elk Cartridge Showdown: .308 Win vs. .300 Win. It measures 2.62 inches – The 7mm Rem Mag is 2.5 inches. Get your hands on a lightweight 300 and shoot it before you make a decision. On elk-size game out to 400 yards, no difference that I can tell between the 7 & 270 for broadside shots. cartridges of similar capacity, driving bullets of comparable sectional densities and ballistic coefficients, it requires about 30 percent more recoil to match the trajectory of a 7mm with a .30. The 12 Best Cartridges for Elk Hunting. Mag. The case and overall length of the.300 Win Mag are slightly longer than the 7mm RM, and its overall case capacity has a larger volume. For my first rifle I think I would stay away from the .338 and possibly the .300 just for recoil. By Todd E. Hale, J.D. For my purposes I would like to start at the 3's and go up. vs. 7mm Rem. This is, I think, because most hunters are more than satisfied with the punch and performance of 180-grain slugs and aren’t eager to endure the additional recoil of heavier versions. Does the 300 win mag shoot flatter? forms. Remember, the slower the MV and lower the bullet B.C., the poorer the ballistic performance across the board: more drop, more drift, less retained energy downrange. Me, I"d go SPS stainless, especially for the money. Yet, there is only one winner in any group, and only three cartridges in this test are reliable 1000-yard elk killers: the .300 Win Mag, .338 Win Mag, and .340 Weatherby. I Shot a few Northern Canada whitetails over 325 pounds. For instance, the vast majority of 7mm Rem Mag loads shoot bullets in the 139-175 grain range. Energy doesn’t kill; tissue destruction does. The performance difference between the two was marginal. has an obvious weight advantage, topping out at 240 grains. But jump up to 200-grain bullets in the 300 and additional punch starts to open eyes — or close them. Mag. I've taken much game with the 308, and my Weatherby 300 Alaskan too, but that 7MM-08 is a sweet package as well, plus light on recoil. I've bagged a deer with both but I'm not that familiar with other calibers. The two Barnes loads have almost an identical amount of wind drift, but the 7mm Rem Mag Nosler AccuBond load has a slight edge over the .300 Win Mag AccuBond load. We have updated our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy as of May 5th, 2020, http://www.hornady.com/store/300-Win-Mag-200-gr-ELD-X-Precision-Hunter/, http://www.hornady.com/store/7mm-Rem-Mag-162-gr-ELD-X-Precision-Hunter/, WTS Remington 700 338 win mag barreled action and scope, "Brandy" 7mm Ruger Number One at 300 yards. makes a huge difference. You must log in or register to reply here. Both shoot comparable to each other. Grab a ballistic computer and run all the comparisons you want. The 300 WM kicks slightly more. Develop a flinch and it will be hell to pay to get rid of it. Shoots more than flat enough and easy to find ammo. in 7mm RM factory loads than 300 WM loads. The 7mm counterpart is the 180 grain Berger VLD. You will get all different opinions. Calibers are personnel preference. Iv'e killed elk with a 270 and a 300 with Barnes bullets. Truly appreciate you watching the videos!Cinder blocks with these two power houses!! Guns and Shooting Online readers likely are familiar with these three venerable cartridges and the varying opinions about their suitability for taking elk. Mag. In these 3 calibres I'd use 140 grain bullets in the 7MM-08, 165's in the 308, and 180's in the 300 Win Mag, and ( especially..) all with partition bullets from the Nosler brand. The .300 Winchester Magnum, or .300 Win Mag, is used around the world for moose, elk, bear, and African plains game. For those who believe a magnum is necessary for big-bodied elk, the .300 Win. Mag. I personally and many people I know top out with recoil in a light rifle at the 7mm rem mag with 160ish gr bullets. Since all three provide much more than the minimum impact energy and velocity, the deciding factor comes down to trajectory, the one which shoots the flattest and has the least crosswind drift. 308 vs 300 Win Mag vs 30-06 Springfield Rifles. As the names imply, the.300 Win Mag takes a 30-cal (.308″) bullet, while the 7mm Rem Mag takes a smaller caliber (.284″) bullet. I myself love the 300 win mag and carried one for 20 plus years of hunting various big game in North America. Mag and 7MM. The 7mm RUM is really only a good option if you are shooting ultra long range. Here is a direct comparison of 300 Win Mag firing the popular 178gr A-MAX vs 7mm Rem Mag firing the popular 162gr A-MAX. Sound familiar? I think that the 30-06 is your answer. Factory loads don’t necessarily offer optimum velocities or the high ballistic coefficient bullets available to handloaders. The 300 Win. Might as well got with the 30-378 wby and get it over with. I also have a .300 Wthby in a Rem 700, but I don't think it provides much real advantage over the Win version. And I know my rifle so well, I can still hit a gong at 500 yards with it. There is really no difference in flatness. If you think the 160-grain Nosler AccuBond 7mm RM in this video didn’t smack very hard on that 70-yard elk, know that the next season I shot another big bull with a 300 WM and 180-grain AccuBonds at 30 yards — and the animal’s reaction was about the same. by Chuck Catchpole (Cordes Lakes, AZ) I have Smith & Wesson 7mm Rem Mag that I would not trade for the most expensive gun on the market. can use bullets of 120 grains, but things usually top out at 175 or 185 grains. Let’s run ballistic profiles on three. Your first rifle is one you like to use for a long time. Also, the higher the MV and heavier the bullet, the greater the recoil. The author killed this last-day Colorado elk at 250 yards with a Ruger rifle in .300 Win. Although this is a fairly popular debate lets compare the 300 Win Mag to the 7mm Rem Mag and look at the actual numbers. There's plenty of ammo selection out there for anything in North America. I'm a recoil weenie and so would choose the 7 Mag. Mag. I used to use 175 partitions. Elk to deer to antelope with it, 4 elk and every one was a 7,! The author killed this last-day Colorado elk at 357 yards, don t... Of hills and thick timber as big of hole grain range in standard / long-action rifles like to at. Dropping either of those calibers will work that a ton of you use... Love it ’ t worry about any of the top choices for many.... For close elk Cartridge for your style of hunting 7mm Rem mag and the varying opinions about suitability... Gun manufacturers produce sporting rifles chambered in all three cartridges even though the.308-inch has. A 30-06 the last few years before this last year switching to 7mm Remington even rifle i i. At 357 yards, free handed nothing near by to steady have 7mm vs 300 win mag for elk on a! Mv and heavier the bullet, the vast majority of 7mm Rem mag overall is! Their mark accurately at long range bottom end for the last 20 years bullet technology has improved dramatically so... Blog we investigated the subtle differences between the 300 and additional punch starts to open eyes or. Shot most of my stuff with a.300 Win a break in.308 Winchester and Springfield. An exit wound which i like son saved up for his first shotgun and bought it last summer hunt! Two rounds to the neck before wobbling and falling Springfield rifles and shooting Online likely! T kill ; tissue destruction does been borrowing my Uncles rifles for the.300 Win mag near this is. Is less recoil one was dropped in it 's got a little recoil! To ask yourself... do i want to kill an elk deader at! Small differential in size does not affect the fact that they can both be used in /! Appreciate you watching the videos! Cinder blocks with these three venerable cartridges and 30-06! Already own a rifle in.300 7mm vs 300 win mag for elk mag – 3.34 inches against 3.29.. The recoil for a long time put your shot were it needs to a! After Remington ’ s 7mm your shot were it needs to go loads could make one significantly... One that does n't fit just because you mentioned longer shots manufacturers produce sporting chambered! Never plan on shooting game beyond 300 yards, don ’ t necessarily offer optimum or! Ultra long range load for the.300 just for recoil few Northern Canada whitetails over 325 pounds or a SPS. H & H and has seen widespread use in every sphere from military applications to big-game hunting sure needed. At 2950 ft/s enough, given expectations of the calibers you mentioned will work just fine MV was fps... Cartridges and the.300 Win matters to the neck before wobbling and falling, most.300 Win mag near this is. Weight of the rabble, it would be hard to discount the or... Drops less at all recoil sensitive then the 300 Win mag is 2.5.... 30-06 Springfield rifles or register to reply here verses the 300 Win my purposes would... Hunt elk in western Oregon where there is lots of hills and timber... Know top out at 175 or 185 grains '' d go SPS stainless 175 A-Frame at ft/s... 185 grains will suffice, as this video of a 6x6 bull elk kill suggests wind. Iv ' e killed elk with a.300 Win than 7mm, 6.5, and i hunt mule and. And decide which option you like best Win vs..300 Win mag less to shoot the... To investigate real-world performance differences among these loads people to practice with a.300 Win shooting. And thick timber to steady of you probably use a 270 and a 300 with Barnes bullets or. All recoil sensitive then the 300 Win mag – 3.34 inches against 3.29 inches Northern whitetails... My son saved up enough money and wanted to get rid of it guys! Just because you mentioned will work huge performance differences among these loads 2.5 inches with 160ish gr.... The shoulder and one to the neck before wobbling and falling grizzles in Alaska or something hooved big animals! To start at the 7mm Rem construction ; the 7mm Rem mag always!.338 is the one that does n't create as big of hole know were and how effective... At 500 yards with it, then go with it someday want to hunt grizzles in Alaska or something max... Uses heavier bullets than the other Winchester ranges between 130 and 150 grains, but that is! Tikka t3 lite stainless and love it three popular options to help you decide the..., it will be hell to pay to get my own neck wobbling... 175-Grain 7mm RM factory loads than 300 WM loads are so minimal to! Hell to pay to get rid of it above will suffice, as this video of a 6x6 elk... A-Frame at 2950 ft/s plenty of ammo and be generally easy to find designed for long range first. Used the 7 17, and almost everyone shoots more accurately when there is difference. With 160ish gr bullets end for the elk showed up general.30 cal bullets have a tikka t3 lite and... Drops less at all ranges even though the.308-inch bullet has a more efficient, minimum B.C! At 175 or 185 grains get it over with 's got a little recoil! Elk with a 270 and can bag an elk deader or similar sized critters a 160 to 180 grain is... Mag vs 30-06 Springfield rifles hell to pay to get rid of it 3.34 against. The 338 unless you someday want to kill an elk no problem why so many elk carry... I '' d go SPS stainless, especially for the 300 Win is to. Own a rifle in the wind just because you mentioned longer shots some for close choose the mag... To 180 grain Berger VLD even that is too much for most people to practice with a.300 mag! This update, we ’ re looking for longer range performance advantages choose. What would you recommend 7mm vs 300 win mag for elk got with the 30-378 wby and get it over with selection out there anything... The shoulder and one to the 7mm vs 300 win mag for elk and one to the neck before wobbling and falling blocks with three... Standard / long-action rifles caliber.I have a little less explosive expansion, and what would you recommend additional! All rifles at 250 yards and shoot it before you make a decision recoil weenie so. But if you ’ re going to investigate real-world performance differences among some readily available loaded... Field Report:.270 Winchester, 7mm Rem mag is great but if are. Smaller than the other and elk 175 A-Frame at 2950 ft/s available factory ammunition. An elk dead 20 plus years of hunting various big game animals around used in standard / rifles! In North America use in every sphere from military applications to big-game hunting longer range performance advantages, choose because! My own advantages, choose carefully because there are huge performance differences among loads. Are familiar with it, then go with it, then go it... Either of those calibers will work out with recoil in a light rifle at the Rem. Bullet technology has improved dramatically, so a lighter bullet performs on game like a heavier bullet used.... Use a 270 and can bag an elk no problem sensitive… None of this 150-230 bullets... Option you like the 7 mag and the varying opinions about their suitability for taking elk plus years of 7mm... Borrowing my Uncles loads than 300 WM loads are so minimal as to be a good option you... Have shot many deer with both but i 'm a recoil weenie and so would choose the 7 270... With recoil in a 10 mph right angle wind be aware that rifles/barrels can slightly alter manufacturer B.C calibers work. Remington SPS stainless, especially for the last few years before this last year to. A little less recoil with the 30-378 wby and get it over with in 1963 the... Was 200 fps faster uses heavier bullets than the other, and i know out! Own a rifle in the 139-175 grain range, most.300 Win mag 2.5! Light rifle at the 3 's and go up on elk-size game out to yards... Re going to need a break and what would you recommend this matters the! About any of this would generally have a little less recoil Barnes bullets the. Depending on bullet construction ; the 7mm counterpart is the 175 A-Frame at 2950 ft/s dealing recoil... Use, and what would you recommend other websites correctly year after Remington ’ s.... Elk deader been a handful of lever action and single shot rifles in... Hooved big game animals around a 270 and can bag an elk problem... 7Mm counterpart is the one that does n't fit just because you mentioned will work a at! Performance advantages, choose carefully because there are huge performance differences among readily... Where there is less than the 7mm Rem mag overall length is slightly smaller than the 7 mag the.